Competition Among Insurers and Consumer Welfare
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article presents a model to analyze consumer welfare, price, and competition in a three-way market among consumers, medical providers, and insurers. While insurers compete with each other for customers, they also act as collective bargaining agents on behalf of consumers in determining the equilibrium price of health care with providers. The entry of an additional insurer thus has contradictory effects on welfare, reducing premiums through competition but increasing price through reduced bargaining power of incumbent insurers. Moreover, the more favorable contracts allow consumers to purchase care more often, shifting out the demand curve for care and increasing price. JEL Classification: D43, I11, L13
منابع مشابه
Measuring Welfare Losses from Adverse Selection and Imperfect Competition in Privatized Medicare
This paper measures welfare losses caused by adverse selection and imperfect competition in privatized Medicare. I model insurers premium and coverage choices in an environment where consumers with heterogeneous preferences may impose di¤erent costs on their insurers. Using insurers behavior and exogenous variation in market structure, I identify a causal link between consumerstypes and insu...
متن کاملStatutory health insurance competition in Europe: a four-country comparison.
This paper explores the goals and implementation of reforms introducing choice of and competition among insurers providing statutory health coverage in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. In theory, health insurance competition can enhance efficiency in health care administration and delivery only if people have free choice of insurer (consumer mobility), if insurers do not have ...
متن کاملInsurer Pricing and Consumer Welfare: Evidence from Medigap∗
While adverse selection is often blamed for ineffi ciently high insurance premiums, imperfect competition is also a pervasive feature of many health insurance markets. In Medicare Supplement insurance (Medigap), two firms control nearly three-fourths of the market and premiums exceed claims by thirty percent. I find that while adverse selection can restrain markups, a low price elasticity and c...
متن کاملPlatform Competition in Two-Sided Markets: The Case of Payment Networks
In this article, we construct a model to study competing payment networks, where networks offer differentiated products in terms of benefits to consumers and merchants. We study market equilibria for a variety of market structures: duopolistic competition and cartel, symmetric and asymmetric networks, and alternative assumptions about consumer preferences. We find that competition unambiguously...
متن کاملThe influence of supplementary health insurance on switching behaviour: evidence from Swiss data.
This paper focuses on the switching behaviour of enrolees in the Swiss basic health insurance system. Even though the new Federal Law on Social Health Insurance (LAMal) was implemented in 1996 to promote competition among health insurers in basic insurance, there is limited evidence of premium convergence within cantons. This indicates that competition has not been effective so far, and reveals...
متن کامل